What would love do?

If ‘love’ were incarnate, ‘what would it do?’; excellent question. Yet, I don’t like ‘using’ my imagination when it comes to reality; knowing is almost always better. First there’s no love incarnate, so, it’s a hypothetical question; probably only realizing the same kind of answers. Much like the words God, hope, etc., love is bally-hooed so much, yet, if we study it it’s simplicity of life in motion itself. Does a toddler not love, or have love? No, they simply do their best, one foot following the other; especially with caring through to loving parent or rents. If we choose to make believe we know instead of discerning, we have to study anew, begin again, what is that; certainly not love- no? In our technocracies sociological programming of us to replace our humanity with exigency, etc., being the norm, we forget each word is a path of study; which serves to evolve us- off by a millimeter, soon off by a mile. Of course ‘departmentalization’ of life, out of us, etc., as well as all other machinations of convolutionaries, etc., are the main ource of lack of experience of giving, getting love. I know I say it alot, yet, still, the intellect can’t lead, for the life doesn’t follow. When we choose the life must follow our intellect’s it’s to our life’s disadvantage, and, of course our intellect’s as well. “…We(e),…”, succeeded to do our best last moment, latest hour and day, that’s experiential knowledge that we’ll do it again in the next moment, hour, day; call it love or whatever, yet, it’s experience- of the life, not the intellect. Then there’s the people who make garnering of ever increasing supposed profit, pleasure and power in ever-increasingly cyclical and centralizing patterns from the ‘use’ of the word ‘love’, in specifically the way your question does; they suggest they know what “Jesus would do”- him being ‘the Prince of love”, etc.. As well, there are the “revolutionary love crowds who ‘use’ love in other ways. Like they say they’re for revolutionary love. As well, just because I study the real teachings of Jesus, the “Prince of Peace” doesn’t mean I’ve ever actually walked his way; though, at times I’ve tried to resemble it. Of course, since love is first and foremost an emotion one has or doesn’t, it’s reality can’t be successfully questioned and is also subjective; so, lots of room for interpretation and projection. Myself, when I feel love, then, I could more successfully answer that question; and, also, I feel a sort of meta-love all the time- which isn’t directed at anyone, rather all life, the Cosmos, the Earth, Gaia, Great Spirit, God, Buddha, etc.. I still don’t want to project what “love would do” because the intellect can’t lead as the life doesn’t follow. For, love is not a thing, and is also not separate from anything else; for e.g., one can be irritated at someone they love- even angry. The truth of what someone feels shouldn’t be projected; the real ness of love within our lives is central to who we are and are not- no place for make believe, no? We forget the elements, ‘let a smile be your ambassador’, etc.; luckily trees don’t forget how to be trees, and the importance of that to the world- or, we’d all already be dead from lack of oxygen, etc.. Simply, walk in nature’s balance, giving back to her abundance. Thanx for all you All do, have a great day 🙂 reality